Category Archives: Uncategorized

Richard Garwin on Graphite-Moderated Reactors

In a 2004 interview, Dr. Garwin spoke about Germany and the first U.S. plutonium-production reactors:

This work was all shared between the British and the Americans, ultimately. The British then bombed the Norwegian plants — heavy water plants — to keep the Germans from getting the heavy water. The Germans had initially tried graphite as a moderator, but it absorbed too many neutrons and they gave it up. But Szilard knew that the graphite manufacture — heating oil, wood, whatever to very high temperature — was usually done using boron carbide electrodes or other materials. The boron has a tremendous appetite for neutrons, so tiny traces of boron in the graphite were responsible for this parasitic loss of neutrons.

Szilard then worked with the suppliers, got somebody to provide very pure graphite without boron, and that’s how our first reactors were made: the Fermi Reactor that went critical December 2nd, 1942 in Chicago, and then the production reactors. Fermi’s Reactor was about two watts of thermal power maximum under the west stands, because it didn’t have any shielding and would have exposed people to too much radiation. The next step was the design of these 200-megawatt reactors for producing plutonium. You get about one gram of plutonium per day for a one-megawatt reactor. So, 200-megawatt reactor, two-tenths of a kilogram per day, and the first Nagasaki bomb used six kilograms of plutonium. So you could make — every 30 days you could make a new core for such a bomb.

Kent Center Occasional Paper and Swedish Company Rebrand

This 2002 lecture by a former Swedish Air Force intelligence analyst, has a few entertaining anecdotes. Here’s one:

In Sweden we had a company with the name Pressklipp, literally translated “Press cutting.” It was a perfectly adequate name since that was exactly the service that the company offered its customers–cutting out and sending copies of newspaper articles on specified subjects or search-words. In the mid-1990s the company changed its name to Observer Media Intelligence. It still supplied most of its customers with the same press cuttings, with the exception that you could get them by email, along with video-recordings and links to pages on the Internet. This is certainly media information – but it is hardly media intelligence. The word ”intelligence” has simply, like in numerous other cases, been added to attract customers and to create an impression of qualified analysis.

Restoration of a Seismic Monitoring Station

The most recent issue of the CTBTO Spectrum has a good deal of worthy material. But I am especially interested in this piece about the restoration of a Senegalese seismic monitoring station which is part of the organization’s International Monitoring System auxiliary seismic network. The mundane details of international policy implementation are always worth a read:

…the first site survey was performed to verify if the site chosen under the Treaty was suitable for acquiring high quality seismic data for the IMS….Unfortunately, seismic background noise from industrial and other activities in Mbour, which is quite a large city, was too high and one of Senegal’s busy main national roads borders the IRD Center. This made the Treaty site, despite all the advantages linked to its location, not suitable for AS097 instal- lation. Alternate sites had therefore to be found.

Postponed 1540 Committee Review Report

According to this press release, some of the UNSCR 1540 committee’s activities concerning its ongoing Comprehensive Review will be delayed:

As noted on 29 April, this year is an important one: The Committee is conducting a Comprehensive Review, prior to renewal of its mandate on 25 April 2021. The plans included, amongst other events, open consultations with Member States and international, regional and subregional organizations, as well as civil society as appropriate. A report on the Review was scheduled to be submitted to the Security Council by 31 December 2020.

However, due to delays caused by the coronavirus pandemic and in order that States may plan accordingly, the Committee has decided that all activities related to the Comprehensive Review, including the open consultations, will be postponed until 2021 with the exception of the process currently under way of revising the Committee matrices, and any other activities that can be undertaken in a virtual format. The Committee will provide further details as soon as it has finalized its plans.

Here’s the 1540 committee April 29 briefing mentioned above. UNSCR 1977 extended the committee’s mandate until April 25, 2021.