Comments on: Ginormous Golf Ball, Ctd.

By: Allen Thomson

Allen Thomson — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 18:09:38 +0000

> So what you’re saying, Allen, is that maybe it is the weather.

Well, the weather would do it for me, but I suspect there may be another reason: Hawaii has operating shipyard facilities and Adak doesn’t. SBX is intended to be a critical component in the GMD missile defense system and there’s only one of it, with no signs of a second one in sight.

The maritime environment is a harsh one, and most large ships need significant amounts of shipyard work on a continuing basis. So it would seem logical to have SBX operate out of Pearl Harbor and only deploy it to Adak for short periods or in times of increased threat of ICBM attack against CONUS.

By: Josh

Josh — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:33:29 +0000

So what you’re saying, Allen, is that maybe it is the weather.

I’m sure the crew of SBX and the habitues of Pearl Harbor are pretty jaded by now, but it’s quite a visually striking artifact. There’s a really nice picture online.

By: Allen Thomson

Allen Thomson — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:23:05 +0000

Further and more: I just noticed that the MDA overview booklets for 2008 and 2009 refer to Adak as the “forward operating base” for SBX rather than as its home port. My understanding of the subtleties of milspeak is limited, but I wonder if calling Adak an FOB doesn’t reflect some change in basing plans.

By: Allen Thomson

Allen Thomson — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:13:16 +0000

The entire GMD part of BMDS (are we acronimificated yet?) seems to be way behind where it was intended to be in the mid-2000s. SBX is around five years late in getting deployed to Adak and looks like it may hang around at Pearl Harbor most of the time indefinitely. Deployment of more interceptor missiles to Ft. Greely seems to be on hold or way slowed down. Honest testing in realistic scenarios is TBD.

Etc.