<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A Modest Proposal	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://totalwonkerr.net/2009/03/30/a-modest-proposal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://totalwonkerr.net/2009/03/30/a-modest-proposal/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:59:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Siddharth		</title>
		<link>https://totalwonkerr.net/2009/03/30/a-modest-proposal/#comment-710</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siddharth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalwonkerr.net/a-modest-proposal/#comment-710</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[	&lt;p&gt;From The Hindu, March 5, 2008:&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;http://www.thehindu.com/2008/03/05/stories/2008030554841000.htm&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;What the &lt;span class=&quot;caps&quot;&gt;IAEA&lt;/span&gt; needs more than anything else is for Iran to resume its adherence to the Additional Protocol. If there is an iota of truth in the “alleged studies” — which Iran says are based on fabricated documents — the best way for the &lt;span class=&quot;caps&quot;&gt;IAEA&lt;/span&gt; to find out is by invoking the wider powers to inspect unlisted sites that the AP confers. Iran had declared that if the &lt;span class=&quot;caps&quot;&gt;UNSC&lt;/span&gt; lifts its sanctions now that all concrete outstanding issues have been resolved, it is willing once again to adhere to the AP. As for the enrichment issue, the Iranian offer of running its national facilities as a multinational venture (with multinational oversight) very much remains on the table. These two elements would go a long way towards assuring the international community that Iran’s nuclear programme was entirely peaceful. But it seems there are more powerful interests at work, with aims that go well beyond what is stated.&lt;/p&gt;

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>From The Hindu, March 5, 2008:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thehindu.com/2008/03/05/stories/2008030554841000.htm" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.thehindu.com/2008/03/05/stories/2008030554841000.htm</a></p>
<p>What the <span class="caps">IAEA</span> needs more than anything else is for Iran to resume its adherence to the Additional Protocol. If there is an iota of truth in the “alleged studies” — which Iran says are based on fabricated documents — the best way for the <span class="caps">IAEA</span> to find out is by invoking the wider powers to inspect unlisted sites that the AP confers. Iran had declared that if the <span class="caps">UNSC</span> lifts its sanctions now that all concrete outstanding issues have been resolved, it is willing once again to adhere to the AP. As for the enrichment issue, the Iranian offer of running its national facilities as a multinational venture (with multinational oversight) very much remains on the table. These two elements would go a long way towards assuring the international community that Iran’s nuclear programme was entirely peaceful. But it seems there are more powerful interests at work, with aims that go well beyond what is stated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
