<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Iran NIE&#8230;How Long Until A Nuke?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://totalwonkerr.net/2007/12/07/the-iran-niehow-long-until-a-nuke/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://totalwonkerr.net/2007/12/07/the-iran-niehow-long-until-a-nuke/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:18:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: MarkoB		</title>
		<link>https://totalwonkerr.net/2007/12/07/the-iran-niehow-long-until-a-nuke/#comment-608</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MarkoB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalwonkerr.net/the-iran-niehow-long-until-a-nuke/#comment-608</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[	&lt;p&gt;A very interesting post. The estimate totaly ignores the issue of when Iran can develop a nuclear warhead available for delivery against the &lt;span class=&quot;caps&quot;&gt;CONUS&lt;/span&gt; by ballistic missile. Doing so pushes these dates out way further. If the purpose is to develop an estimate of when Iran could hit the US with a nuke you have to include that&#8230;especially given all the fuss about &lt;span class=&quot;caps&quot;&gt;GMD&lt;/span&gt; interceptors for Poland.&lt;/p&gt;

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>A very interesting post. The estimate totaly ignores the issue of when Iran can develop a nuclear warhead available for delivery against the <span class="caps">CONUS</span> by ballistic missile. Doing so pushes these dates out way further. If the purpose is to develop an estimate of when Iran could hit the US with a nuke you have to include that&#8230;especially given all the fuss about <span class="caps">GMD</span> interceptors for Poland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PC		</title>
		<link>https://totalwonkerr.net/2007/12/07/the-iran-niehow-long-until-a-nuke/#comment-607</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalwonkerr.net/the-iran-niehow-long-until-a-nuke/#comment-607</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[	&lt;p&gt;I see your point about timeframes. My impression is basically that the estimates haven&#8217;t really changed though. Five years is a pretty big window when the early date is about 2 years off. I&#8217;d be curious to know if the classified version of the 2005 &lt;span class=&quot;caps&quot;&gt;NIE&lt;/span&gt; (or perhaps the one that it was updating) included specific years like 2007, and was just changed to &#8220;early to mid-next decade&#8221; in the unclassified version.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;I agree with the covert enrichment route as well, and I suspect that influenced, in part, the notion that an early date for creating enough &lt;span class=&quot;caps&quot;&gt;HEU&lt;/span&gt; for a weapon is very unlikely.&lt;/p&gt;

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>I see your point about timeframes. My impression is basically that the estimates haven&#8217;t really changed though. Five years is a pretty big window when the early date is about 2 years off. I&#8217;d be curious to know if the classified version of the 2005 <span class="caps">NIE</span> (or perhaps the one that it was updating) included specific years like 2007, and was just changed to &#8220;early to mid-next decade&#8221; in the unclassified version.</p>
<p>I agree with the covert enrichment route as well, and I suspect that influenced, in part, the notion that an early date for creating enough <span class="caps">HEU</span> for a weapon is very unlikely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
