https://totalwonkerr.net/2007/07/27/more-on-nnsa-and-nuclear-forces/ Mon, 30 Jul 2007 06:20:38 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 https://totalwonkerr.net/2007/07/27/more-on-nnsa-and-nuclear-forces/#comment-578 Mon, 30 Jul 2007 06:20:38 +0000 http://www.totalwonkerr.net/more-on-nnsa-and-nuclear-forces/#comment-578 oh, I should have been more explicit…the comment was a reflection on clinton…a lot of the focus goes on team bush but a lot of the bad stuff was there during the clinton years too. A lot of people give clinton good marks only because this administration is a bit more nutheaded than the previous one.

]]> https://totalwonkerr.net/2007/07/27/more-on-nnsa-and-nuclear-forces/#comment-577 Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:27:33 +0000 http://www.totalwonkerr.net/more-on-nnsa-and-nuclear-forces/#comment-577 Agreed. I used the word “reinforces” to cover my ass, but I should have taken the time to be more explicit.

]]> https://totalwonkerr.net/2007/07/27/more-on-nnsa-and-nuclear-forces/#comment-576 Fri, 27 Jul 2007 03:31:17 +0000 http://www.totalwonkerr.net/more-on-nnsa-and-nuclear-forces/#comment-576 that’s not new. Clinton had the same thing: the 2001 annual defense department report to congress (william cohen) states that nuclear weapons are to “hedge against defeat of us conventional forces in defense of vital interests” (in chapter 2)…notice that that’s more permissive than this team bush quote…“defense of vital interests” can be construed by others to be a reference to aggression

]]>