<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Iran Ear Candy	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://totalwonkerr.net/2006/08/24/iran-ear-candy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://totalwonkerr.net/2006/08/24/iran-ear-candy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 17:13:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: hass		</title>
		<link>https://totalwonkerr.net/2006/08/24/iran-ear-candy/#comment-281</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hass]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 17:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalwonkerr.net/iran-ear-candy/#comment-281</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Of course Dr Perkovich isn&#8217;t being accurate when he claims that Iran &#8220;hid 18 years of nuclear programs&#8221; and so should be treated differently. In fact Iran repeatedly tried to cooperate with the IAEA in developing enrichment, and was blocked by the US:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#8220;When Iran openly sought to develop the fuel &lt;br /&gt;
cycle and the IAEA was willing to help it, the U.S. &lt;br /&gt;
intervened to stop this. Whenever Tehran signed a &lt;br /&gt;
public agreement with an international partner, &lt;br /&gt;
Washington worked overtime to kill it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given this reality, the only way to build a fuel cycle&lt;br /&gt;
programme â€” even if one&#8217;s aims were purely peaceful â€”&lt;br /&gt;
would have been to go about it with stealth.&#8221;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#8220;Though there has been a surfeit of motivated and ill-informed commentary about how Iran &#8220;concealed&#8221; its uranium enrichment programme from the IAEA &#8220;in violation of the NPT&#8221; until it was &#8220;caught cheating&#8221; in 2002, the fact is that Iran was not obliged to inform the Agency about those facilities at the time.&#8221;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SOURCE: Siddharth Varadarajan &lt;br /&gt;
Associate Editor, The Hindu &lt;br /&gt;
http://svaradarajan.blogspot.com]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course Dr Perkovich isn&#8217;t being accurate when he claims that Iran &#8220;hid 18 years of nuclear programs&#8221; and so should be treated differently. In fact Iran repeatedly tried to cooperate with the IAEA in developing enrichment, and was blocked by the US:</p>
<p>&#8220;When Iran openly sought to develop the fuel <br />
cycle and the IAEA was willing to help it, the U.S. <br />
intervened to stop this. Whenever Tehran signed a <br />
public agreement with an international partner, <br />
Washington worked overtime to kill it.</p>
<p>Given this reality, the only way to build a fuel cycle<br />
programme â€” even if one&#8217;s aims were purely peaceful â€”<br />
would have been to go about it with stealth.&#8221;</p>
<p>and </p>
<p>&#8220;Though there has been a surfeit of motivated and ill-informed commentary about how Iran &#8220;concealed&#8221; its uranium enrichment programme from the IAEA &#8220;in violation of the NPT&#8221; until it was &#8220;caught cheating&#8221; in 2002, the fact is that Iran was not obliged to inform the Agency about those facilities at the time.&#8221;</p>
<p>SOURCE: Siddharth Varadarajan <br />
Associate Editor, The Hindu <br />
<a href="http://svaradarajan.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow ugc">http://svaradarajan.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
