<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Khan Network: Steve Coll in New Yorker	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://totalwonkerr.net/2006/08/01/khan-network-new-yorker-qa-with-steve-coll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://totalwonkerr.net/2006/08/01/khan-network-new-yorker-qa-with-steve-coll/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 23:32:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: hass		</title>
		<link>https://totalwonkerr.net/2006/08/01/khan-network-new-yorker-qa-with-steve-coll/#comment-228</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hass]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 23:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalwonkerr.net/khan-network-new-yorker-qa-with-steve-coll/#comment-228</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Watch the intentional resort to ambiguity.&lt;br /&gt;
Nuclear &#8220;capacity&#8221; is a nice ambiguity that implies &#8220;weapons&#8221; but doesn&#8217;t actually say it since there&#8217;s no evidence. Instead, we&#8217;re given timelines to nuclear &#8220;capacity&#8221; and told of the threat posed by Iran&#8217;s &#8220;nuclear ambitions&#8221; &#8211; nevermind that both are perfectly legal under the NPT]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch the intentional resort to ambiguity.<br />
Nuclear &#8220;capacity&#8221; is a nice ambiguity that implies &#8220;weapons&#8221; but doesn&#8217;t actually say it since there&#8217;s no evidence. Instead, we&#8217;re given timelines to nuclear &#8220;capacity&#8221; and told of the threat posed by Iran&#8217;s &#8220;nuclear ambitions&#8221; &#8211; nevermind that both are perfectly legal under the NPT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CKR		</title>
		<link>https://totalwonkerr.net/2006/08/01/khan-network-new-yorker-qa-with-steve-coll/#comment-227</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CKR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 16:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalwonkerr.net/khan-network-new-yorker-qa-with-steve-coll/#comment-227</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Manhattan Project designed two nuclear weapons, operating on different principles of forming a supercritical mass, in 26 months. It cost $2 billion mid-1940s dollars. They did not have anything like the computing power of modern pcs, nor did they have all the hints and guesses now generally available about how to make a bomb.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Iran has been fiddling with various aspects of bomb-making for a decade or more. Presumably they have picked up some more information along that way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So in some theoretical way, yes, Iran could have a bomb in two more years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, when we consider their progress so far and their economic and technical capabilities to mount another Manhattan Project, not this year or the next is a pretty good estimate. Maybe longer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Manhattan Project designed two nuclear weapons, operating on different principles of forming a supercritical mass, in 26 months. It cost $2 billion mid-1940s dollars. They did not have anything like the computing power of modern pcs, nor did they have all the hints and guesses now generally available about how to make a bomb.</p>
<p>Iran has been fiddling with various aspects of bomb-making for a decade or more. Presumably they have picked up some more information along that way.</p>
<p>So in some theoretical way, yes, Iran could have a bomb in two more years.</p>
<p>However, when we consider their progress so far and their economic and technical capabilities to mount another Manhattan Project, not this year or the next is a pretty good estimate. Maybe longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
