<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: DPRK FM Speaks	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://totalwonkerr.net/2006/04/07/dprk-fm-speaks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://totalwonkerr.net/2006/04/07/dprk-fm-speaks/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:22:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: j house		</title>
		<link>https://totalwonkerr.net/2006/04/07/dprk-fm-speaks/#comment-98</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[j house]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totalwonkerr.net/dprk-fm-speaks/#comment-98</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The U.S. is currently using covert means to disrupt Iran&#8217;s attempts to go from pilot to production of EU.&lt;br /&gt;
The reporting and speculation that the U.S. will use nukes against Iran is Seymour Hersh hogwash&#8230;it just isn&#8217;t necessary to use nukes even if the U.S. were to strike Iran&#8217;s nuclear infrastructure. There are many weak points in the fuel production cycle that the U.S. could cripple in a conventional attack that would delay Iran&#8217;s program considerably (assuming Iran doesn&#8217;t have vast EU production facilities unknown to the US IC or obtains HEU by some other means).&lt;br /&gt;
There are no good options available to the US right now short of covert disruption operations.&lt;br /&gt;
Diplomacy is a loser from the start and thus only seeks to allow Iran to perfect their program over time&#8230;did it work with N. Korea and Pakistan? Of course it didn&#8217;t. These 2 countries were determined to join the nuclear club whatever the consequences, and so is Iran.&lt;br /&gt;
Mark my words &#8216;arms control&#8217; wonk&#8230;36 -48 months from now, Iran will declare it possesses a nuclear weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
It may not be deliverable by BM and may be a crude design, but the capability of Iran to build atomic bombs WILL be a grave threat to U.S. and Israeli national security and these 2 nuclear powers aren&#8217;t going to sit on their hands waiting for the inevitable to happen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. is currently using covert means to disrupt Iran&#8217;s attempts to go from pilot to production of EU.<br />
The reporting and speculation that the U.S. will use nukes against Iran is Seymour Hersh hogwash&#8230;it just isn&#8217;t necessary to use nukes even if the U.S. were to strike Iran&#8217;s nuclear infrastructure. There are many weak points in the fuel production cycle that the U.S. could cripple in a conventional attack that would delay Iran&#8217;s program considerably (assuming Iran doesn&#8217;t have vast EU production facilities unknown to the US IC or obtains HEU by some other means).<br />
There are no good options available to the US right now short of covert disruption operations.<br />
Diplomacy is a loser from the start and thus only seeks to allow Iran to perfect their program over time&#8230;did it work with N. Korea and Pakistan? Of course it didn&#8217;t. These 2 countries were determined to join the nuclear club whatever the consequences, and so is Iran.<br />
Mark my words &#8216;arms control&#8217; wonk&#8230;36 -48 months from now, Iran will declare it possesses a nuclear weapon.<br />
It may not be deliverable by BM and may be a crude design, but the capability of Iran to build atomic bombs WILL be a grave threat to U.S. and Israeli national security and these 2 nuclear powers aren&#8217;t going to sit on their hands waiting for the inevitable to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
